“Network convergence is the efficient
coexistence of telephone, video and data communication within a single network. The use of multiple
communication modes on a single network offers convenience and flexibility that
are not possible with separate infrastructure. Network
convergence is also called media convergence.”
Media convergence is good in the sense that it allows for
creative industries to circulate content and advertisements. Such as the convergence
of traditional and digital sources powers our newspapers to produce much more
efficient and up-to-date information. It can reach a much larger audience due
to its available access worldwide.
One issue though, is knowing whether or not the information is valid or true. After all, sources
may not be required or honest, stripping the original author or their credit. And as you
may know, just about anyone believes what they see on the internet to be true,
which causes a lot of false information. Outdated content and improper sourcing
isn’t fair to the original publisher and the readers.
There is
also the saying, “social media is killing press” which is true in a lot of
ways. Who wants to go out of their way to receive a paper and physically turn
the pages? Most people, and many would argue that its no longer 1955. This
takes away jobs and can cause a series of other issues. Why would broadcasting and press want to pay employees when they can slash their numbers in half an make more money? There is also the imposing risk of broadcasting and press companies to be bought out.
Overall,
media convergence has its many pros and cons. I do enjoy it, but don’t at the same
time. Whether it is beneficial or not will all be seen in the near future. It may help us, it may destroy us.
Quote Source: http://searchconvergedinfrastructure.techtarget.com/definition/network-convergence
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete